UNITED STATES
There were no surprises from the Fed meeting; all as expected: No rate change, and the announcement that balance sheet tapering will begin in October, following the procedures laid out over the spring and summer of 2014, and detailed last June. All the same, it was a critical meeting. First because it was the last one for Stanley Fischer. With his departure, plus, cumulatively, those of other four Board members, the weight of his lingering influence will be critical as a new Board may seek to change the course of policy. Fischer’s guidance was critical, as had been Bernanke’s, in shaping the approach of the Yellen Fed. Second, because, in the Q&A, Yellen made two important clarifications: That the committee in general understands that low inflation in 2017 is not structural but idiosyncratic; thus, that it does not stand in the way of continued rate hikes. That the decision to begin tapering arises from a belief in solid foundations for economic growth. The economic recovery is well-founded. Thus, the process of balance sheet adjustment is not to be countered except for major, unexpected economic disturbances. In fact, Yellen hinted that she thought the Fed would first cut again rates than change the course of balance sheet adjustment.
The new forecasts, and the press conference, reinforced the call for a rate hike in December: Now, 12 out of 16 participants project a hike. There were upgrades to the GDP and employment forecasts, and, as noted, continued skepticism from Yellen about the significance of the weaker-than-expected core inflation numbers. We expect that the hike will come. Following a long course of downgrades to the terminal rate, this set of projections brought it down, again, to 2.8%. In other words, the long-run expected real rate is only 0.8%. Considering that the terminal rate would be close to what the Fed expects the underlying neutral real rate to be, and that Yellen often refers to today’s real underlying neutral rate as close to zero, both, the Fed expects the neutral to rise, and not by much. Still, given that by 2019 and beyond the Fed will be different, the market seemed to dismiss this possibility.
This is a busy week for data; a slew about the housing market, new readings of confidence, durable goods, a new (final) reading of Q3/GDP, personal income, consumption, and the PCE deflator. It also brings a couple of important Fed speeches; the last one from Fischer and a policy-related one from Yellen.
- Wednesday, September 27: Durable Goods Orders – August. (Consensus 1%momsa; ex-transp 0.3%momsa; Capital goods shipments nondefense ex-aircraft 0.5%momsa). Core durable goods orders drifted steadily higher since mid-2016. Growth in core shipments crossed into positive territory in early 2017, after a two-year long slump. Shipments (which are part of GDP) are now in a healthy recovery, although in nominal value they are barely back to the level at end-2011. The post-hurricane rebuilding should reinforce the trend, at least temporarily.
- Friday, September 29: Personal Income, Spending, Deflator – August. (Consensus, income +0.2%momsa, spending +0.1%momsa; core deflator (PCE) 0.2%mom; 1.4%yoy). Distortions related to Hurricanes Harvey and Irma will probably show up. Even so, the underlying trend for income and spending is strong and steady. Nominal PCE is up 4.2%yoy in July; 2.7%, real. This continues to drive the economy. In fact, this week will also show the third revision to Q2/GDP, which showed (and is expected to continue to show) personal consumption growth of 3.3%saar. The story for the deflator is another. The core PCE deflator is languishing at 1.4%yoy, well below the Fed’s 2% target. The picture should change in August. However, Yellen’s post-FOMC conference provided some relieve. She was quite explicit in attributing the 2017 slowdown to special, “non-structural” circumstances. The takeaway is that these momentary low numbers will not spook the Fed. As discussed above, we expect a hike in December—despite low inflation readings, including in the Fed’s own most favored indicator.
Mich. Sent. – Final. (Consensus 95.3). The question will be the impact of the Hurricanes. Will it already come in this reading? After Katrina, sentiment dropped 20 points. Sandy pushed the index down 10 points. The impact of each was short-lived. At this stage, the short-term risk is for lower confidence readings. That said, confidence has been running high, and will probably remain resilient to short-term fluctuations.


Comments are closed.